### Book I: Innovations
#### Part I – The Sacraments
**Ch. I Baptism—Trine Immersion**
Triple (trine) immersion is presented as the proper, apostolic, and nearly universal ancient mode of baptism, attested by Apostolic Canons, Didache, Tertullian, Hippolytus, Athanasius, Basil, Chrysostom, Augustine, and many others. Single immersion is said to have originated with the Eunomians. The Latins are charged with abandoning this practice (except in extraordinary cases) and thus departing from the ordinance handed down from the Lord and the Apostles. Supporting Latin admissions (Catholic Encyclopedia, Aquinas, Trent Catechism, etc.) are cited.
**Ch. II Eucharist and the Liturgy**
- **Infant Communion**: Practiced in the ancient Church (Augustine, Innocent I, Gelasius, Leo the Great, etc.); later restricted by Latins on the grounds that infants lack the use of reason.
- **Leavened Bread**: Ordinary leavened bread was the ancient usage; unleavened bread (azymes) is a later Western change. The 1054 anathema against “prozymite heretics” is noted.
- **Wafers**: Not the ancient form; first clear evidence appears only in the 11th century.
- **Elevation of the Host**: Introduced no earlier than the late 12th century (formalized under Honorius III ca. 1217).
- **Epiklesis**: All ancient liturgies (East and West) contained an invocation of the Holy Spirit; the Latins omitted it.
- **Transubstantiation**: The term and scholastic application are late (first used ca. 1079); Orthodox object to the philosophical framework.
- **Communion under Both Kinds**: Christ’s command and ancient practice require both bread and wine for the laity; Latins restricted the chalice.
- **Conservatism of the Orthodox Liturgy**: The Byzantine rite remained essentially unchanged (Barberini MS of 790 compared with 19th-century usage).
**Ch. III Chrismation (Confirmation)**
Administered immediately after baptism to children in the early Church; Latins delay it until the age of reason.
**Ch. IV Holy Unction**
Ancient practice administered the sacrament to the sick; Latins largely restricted it to the dying (“Extreme Unction”).
**Ch. V Marriage**
- **Clerical Celibacy**: Married clergy (including priests) were the ancient norm (Apostolic Canons, Nicaea, Trullo, Paphnutius at Nicaea, etc.). Mandatory celibacy is a later Western imposition, inconsistently applied even in Latin Eastern-rite churches.
- **Divorce**: Absolute indissolubility is rejected; Christ’s exception and patristic/imperial practice permitted divorce and remarriage in certain cases.
- **Prohibited Degrees**: Popes dispensed marriages within degrees forbidden by the early Church and Leviticus (avunculate, sister-in-law, even brother-sister in some cases).
- **Fourth (and more) Marriages**: Orthodox limit is three; Latins permit more.
**Ch. VI Confession**
Differences are mainly philosophical: Latin practice became more formal, juridical, and impersonal (wooden confessional booth introduced in the 16th century).
**Ch. VII Holy Orders**
For most of the first millennium the West, like the East, used only imposition of hands; later Latins added the “tradition of the instruments.”
#### Part II – Theological Innovations
**Ch. I Filioque Added to the Creed**
The clause “and the Son” was improperly inserted into the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed (forbidden by the Third Ecumenical Council). Pope Leo III ordered its omission and had the original Creed engraved on silver shields. It entered Roman usage only in the 11th century. Theological problems (Father alone as Cause, Maximus the Confessor, etc.) and the 1054 Schism are detailed. Classic Orthodox critiques (Photius, Palamas, etc.) are listed.
**Ch. II Legalistic View of Original Sin**
An excessively juridical understanding, reflected in modern Catholic documents on unbaptized infants.
**Ch. III Latin Doctrine of Salvation**
Orthodoxy understands salvation as theosis (union with God). The West, beginning especially with Anselm, developed penal substitutionary atonement, which the early Church did not hold.
**Ch. IV Purgatory**
A novel dogma of purgatorial fire after death; opposed by Mark of Ephesus and others; Latin admissions of its late appearance are cited.
**Ch. V The Papal Treasury of Merit**
13th-century novelty of a superabundance of saints’ merits that can be distributed; formally defined by Clement VI in 1343.
**Ch. VI Indulgences**
Admitted novelty; first applied to souls in purgatory by Sixtus IV in 1476.
**Ch. VII Full Reward for the Just Before the Last Judgment**
Defined by Benedict XII in 1336; contradicted earlier by John XXII.
**Ch. VIII Essence-Energies Distinction and Hesychasm**
Orthodox teaching (Palamas, John of Damascus, Cappadocians, etc.) versus Latin rejection.
**Ch. IX Scholasticism**
Second-millennium Latin reliance on Aristotelian logic and rationalism versus the patristic methodology of the first millennium.
**Ch. X Modernism and Vatican II**
Significant theological and practical changes in 20th-century Roman Catholicism.
**Ch. XI Variations of Roman Catholicism**
Internal inconsistencies and rival parties within Latin Christianity.
**Ch. XII Immaculate Conception of Mary**
Defined by Pius IX in 1854; opposed as a novelty by earlier popes, Aquinas, Bernard of Clairvaux, and the 1672 Synod of Jerusalem.
#### Part III – Other Innovative Customs and Practices
- Gregorian Calendar’s Easter calculation (can coincide with Jewish Passover, forbidden by Nicaea).
- Fasting on Saturday (condemned by Trullo and Photius).
- Musical instruments in church (unknown in the early Church; vocal singing only).
- Sign of the Cross (changed from right-to-left to left-to-right).
- Canonization (first solemn papal canonization only in 993; later restriction of local episcopal authority).
- Papal titles, exemptions, diocesan interference, encyclicals, elections, interdicts, jubilees, oaths of fealty, confirmation of bishops, crosier usage, episcopal rings, clerical beards, military bishops, stigmata, visions of receiving milk from Mary’s breast, Hail Mary as fixed formula, changes in monasticism, Western iconography, devotion to the Sacred Hearts, and restriction of the vernacular.
### Book II: The Papacy
The bishop of Rome possesses primacy of honor but not supremacy or universal jurisdiction. Claims of supremacy rest on doubtful Petrine succession lists, misreadings of Cyprian and Augustine, rejection of Chalcedon’s Canon 28 (which ranked Constantinople second because it was the new imperial capital), and a monarchical rather than conciliar ecclesiology. Patristic and conciliar evidence is presented for a pentarchy of equal patriarchal sees under the emperor and the councils.
### Book III: Forgeries
The greatest East–West controversies involved false documents, most of which were formally abandoned by the end of the 18th century but had already shaped Latin claims.
**Major forgeries of historic consequence**
- Pseudo-Isidorian Decretals (promoted papal power; used by Nicholas I, Leo IX, Gratian, etc.).
- Donation of Constantine (forged to give the pope temporal power and supremacy; cited by Leo IX against Cerularius).
- Forged Greek catena of Nicholas of Cotrone (used extensively by Aquinas; ~72 % of the patristic/conciliar quotes against the Greeks are inauthentic).
- Symmachian forgeries (“the See of Rome can be judged by no one”).
**Numerous lesser forgeries and misquotations**
Pseudo-Clementine literature, corrupted versions of Nicaea and Sardica, Peter Damian’s misquotations on the Filioque, inauthentic citations in the Trent Catechism, interpolations promoting purgatory, Arabic Canons of Nicaea, the misquoted “Roma locuta est,” false claims about the Rosary’s origin with Dominic, spurious letters of Ignatius, Vigilius, Leo, Gelasius, etc., textual corruptions introducing the Filioque, forgeries related to the Immaculate Conception (Román de la Higuera’s chronicles, leaden tablets of Sacromonte, etc.), and many others (Canterbury forgeries, Glastonbury “factory of fraud,” etc.). These documents are said to have distorted the understanding of antiquity and provided a false foundation for separation from the Orthodox Church.
### Appendices
- Ecumenical authority of the Apostolic Canons (accepted by the early Church and later councils).
- Additional material on trine immersion confirming its near-universal ancient practice.
**Overall presentation of the work**
The volumes argue that the Orthodox Church has preserved the faith, sacraments, liturgy, and ecclesiology of the undivided Church of the first millennium, while the Latin West introduced a long series of innovations in doctrine, practice, and governance, frequently supported by forged or interpolated texts. The result is presented as a departure from the original apostolic tradition that the Orthodox Church continues to embody.
You can buy the volumes here:
Volume 1: https://uncutmountainpress.com/products/the-errors-of-the-latins-volume-i
Volume 2: https://uncutmountainpress.com/products/the-errors-of-the-latins-vol-ii