The primacy of the pope
The cornerstone of all the errors of the Catholic Church is the doctrine of papal primacy. The essence of this doctrine is as follows: the Roman Pontiff, Catholics teach, is the supreme ruler of the entire Church founded by the Savior; he is God's vicar on earth and the head of all believers. As such, the Pope is superior to the Ecumenical Councils, which receive their confirmation and sanction from the Pope.
On what do Catholics base this anti-Christian teaching about the visible primacy of the Roman Pontiff in the Church?
The Roman Pontiff, Catholics teach, is the successor to the See of St. Peter the Apostle, and therefore should be entitled to all the privileges granted by God to Peter. Peter's privileges consisted in the fact that he was supposedly appointed by Christ as prince over the apostles and supreme head of the entire Church.
Before examining the above-mentioned teaching, let us ask Catholics in what sense they consider the pope to be the successor of the Apostle Peter. If the pope is the successor of the Apostle Peter in the see—in other words, he occupies the see that St. Peter supposedly once occupied—then this foundation is extremely shaky, since it is reliably known that St. Peter was never, in the true sense, Bishop of Rome. True, St. Peter, as tradition says, founded the Roman Church; but, according to the same tradition, St. Peter appointed St. Linus as its ruler, while he himself went to other places to preach the Gospel. If, however, we recognize the pope as the successor of St. Peter solely because the apostle founded the Roman Church, then, on this basis, we must also recognize the patriarchs of Antioch and Alexandria as successors of St. Peter, since the latter churches were also founded by St. Peter, the Antiochian Church even earlier than the Roman Church. – Why, then, do Catholics attribute only to their Pope the right to be called the successor of the holy Apostle Peter?