The Council of Ferrara-Florence was a masterpiece of political compromise. The survival of the empire was at stake: Turkish troops stood at the walls of Constantinople. From the standpoint of common sense, signing the union was an act of salvation, a "lesser evil."
Today we live in a world of total pragmatism. We are told, "Truth is what works." Mark of Ephesus, with his solitary "No," reverses this logic. He asserts that existence is determined not by the survival of the flesh, but by fidelity to logos. If the Church (or individual) preserves itself at the cost of distorting its ontological essence, then that which is "saved" is no longer the Church (or individual). One is tempted to ask the rhetorical question: "Are we too often sacrificing meaning for the sake of 'efficiency' and 'preservation of structures'?"
Modern democratic culture has taught us that truth is the result of a contract. If the majority voted "yes," then that's reality. In 1439, almost everyone voted "yes." But Mark reminds us of the objectivity of Truth. It is not constructed through negotiations. The saint maintains that truth is not an "opinion," but an "event" given to us. In the postmodern era, where everything is text and interpretation, Mark of Ephesus emerges as a stern realist: there are things that cannot be deconstructed.









